|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Marc-Andre Hebert wrote:
I know the ext2 fs doesnt make much sense for us, it was kept like that
mostly because that how it was.
Your truly knows that JFFS didnt exist at the time this choice (his
choice) was made. ;-)
Havent found much on the mailing list on the cachepolicy but Im comparing
my mtd map file against the lubbock-flash.c and Im seeing some calls
concerning cache that I dont have. So thats probably it. Ill try updating
my code tomorrow morning.
No -- those are unrelated. They will increase read performance from the
flash, and even possibly move the actual bug around by changing the
cache usage pattern. But the fundamental issue wont be fixed (which is
btw only a single line that needs to be added to the appropriate place
in mtdblock.c.
Nicolas
-------------------------------------------------------------------
List admin: rel="nofollow" lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm
FAQ: rel="nofollow" www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php
Etiquette: rel="nofollow" www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
|
